Re: [code] [textadept] Textadept 5.2

From: steve donovan <>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 07:24:18 +0200

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Mitchell <> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I recall trying to do annotations in the past, but
> I don't remember why I decided against them. I will revisit this. Thanks for
> the suggestion.

Actually, the way you're currently using Scintilla annotations is
great, at least for Lua; it is good to see errors inline.

It would be cool to do it for C/C++ as well, but this is not so important.

BTW, what would be the recommended way to bind 'compile' to running 'make'?

steve d.

You are subscribed to
To change subscription settings, send an e-mail to
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to
Received on Tue 03 Apr 2012 - 01:24:18 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue 03 Apr 2012 - 06:34:52 EDT