Re: [code] [textadept] view questions

From: Mitchell <m.att.foicica.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:54:38 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)

Chris,

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Chris Emerson wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:29:34AM -0400, Mitchell wrote:
>> A `view.remove()` function would need to know which view to switch
>> to after the fact.
>
> What about allowing view:remove() on a view which isn't current?

I'm not sure how I feel about this because then `view:remove()` becomes
conditional which can be confusing.

>> I am more comfortable with the current implementation: the user moves to
>> the view they want to keep open and closes the other one.
>
> What about a multi-level split:
>
>
> View A |View B
> |
> +------------
> |View C
> |
>
> The user would like to remove view A but leave B/C as the top level split,
> and I don't think it's currently possible.

You are correct, this is currently not possible. I'm not sure how it would
be implemented though, based on the current method.

Cheers,
Mitchell

-- 
You are subscribed to code.att.foicica.com.
To change subscription settings, send an e-mail to code+help.att.foicica.com.
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to code+unsubscribe.att.foicica.com.
Received on Thu 20 Jun 2013 - 09:54:38 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 21 Jun 2013 - 06:36:36 EDT