Re: [code] [textadept] Another write-up

From: <>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:18:37 -0500

Hey Mitchell,

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016, at 09:59 PM, Mitchell wrote:

> Thanks for your article! It was a good read. I agree with you that
> Textadept’s “properties.lua” is a bit of an oddball. There’s a bit of
> history on it (, but at
> the time that seemed the “sane” way for configuring buffer defaults.

Thanks for the reference. It makes sense now as to why the
properties.lua has such control over the UI properties of Textadept
and works slightly different from the rest of the endless
configurable settings.

Thanks again,


You are subscribed to
To change subscription settings, send an e-mail to
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to
Received on Tue 09 Feb 2016 - 21:18:37 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed 10 Feb 2016 - 06:42:52 EST