Re: What's required in a personal init.lua?

From: mitchell <mforal.n....at.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:48:40 -0700 (PDT)

Russell,

> I'm utterly confused about what's required in a personal init.lua. The
> manual states -
>
> "After loading the core modules, Textadept begins loading additional
> modules. It first checks for a ~/.textadept/init.lua user module. If
> the module is found, it is run and skips loading the default modules
> specified in init.lua. Otherwise a mixture of core extension and
> generic modules are loaded.
>
> After loading the additional modules, Textadept parses command line
> arguments, or if none are specified, reloads the last saved session."
>
> I simply don't understand this. It first seems to say that if a
> personal init.lua is found, it doesn't load the init.lua which is
> distributed with Textadept. However it goes on to say "Otherwise a
> mixture of core extension and generic modules are loaded." I have
> looked over some of Textadept's code and it appears that does a
> regular expression search for modules, loading those it finds.
>
> To put my question in concrete terms, I will give an example. I want
> to use the Bufferutils module, so I download the file bufferutils.lua
> from the Textadept wiki and save it to ~/.textadept/modules (albeit
> under Windows). I then create an EMPTY init.lua - ~/.textadept/
> init.lua and add the line "require 'bufferutils' ". When I run
> Textadept I get the following text appear in a GTK (?) error dialog
> box: "C:\z\downloads\textadept/init.lua:19: C:\z\downloads\textadept/
> modules/bufferutils.lua:91: attempt to index local 'keys' (a nil
> value)". However if I add this line to the init.lua file distributed
> with Textadept I don't get any error message and the expected
> functionality works as expected.
>
> Where am I going wrong?

init.lua has been confusing for a while. I have added additional
documentation here:

http://caladbolg.net/luadoc/textadept2/manual/6_Startup.html

I hope that clears things up. If you have more questions, please ask.

Mitchell
Received on Tue 30 Mar 2010 - 20:48:40 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 08 Mar 2012 - 11:41:43 EST