Re: API Changes

From: mitchell <mforal.n....at.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:55:42 -0700 (PDT)

Brian,

On Jun 14, 12:38 pm, Brian Schott <briancsch....at.gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:41 PM, mitchell <mforal.n....at.gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
>
> > On Jun 13, 12:34 am, Brian Schott <briancsch....at.gmail.com> wrote:
> > > MARK_BOOKMARK_COLOR, MARK_SNIPPET_COLOR and such will still be in the
> > > various _m.textadept modules, I see. Are these override-able in user
> > themes?
>
> > Yes; I believe they are now so that wouldn't change.
>
> Ah. I haven't actually tried modifying these in user themes yet. My other
> question is the constants used for the different bookmark types. Should I
> start a wiki page documenting which constants such as MARK_BOOKMARK and
> MARK_SNIPPET are claimed? Any extension scripts that conflict about the
> meaning of line marks will break each other.

It's documented in the LuaDoc, but if you want to put more on the
wiki, go ahead.

Mitchell

>
>
>
> > > Not really API-related:
> > > *   Any thoughts on how to fix the behavior of the select_paragraph()
> > > function in textadept.editing?
>
> > I'm not sure what the issue is here. Can you discuss or point out the
> > discussion?
>
> If you place the cursor on a line of text with blank lines on either side,
> or the first line of a paragraph, the function will select the text above
> the line that the cursor is on. There's some discussion of this in the
> line-wrap thread.
>
>
>
> > > *   What did you think of the Linux single-instance code?
>
> > It's cool. Now if only the same feature could be added for win32...
>
> > > *   Will this next release be based off of Scintilla 2.12?
>
> > Whatever latest Scintilla is; if it's 2.12 then yes.
>
> Very nice. The newer versions have a few useful GTK bugfixes.
>
>
>
Received on Mon 14 Jun 2010 - 12:55:42 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 08 Mar 2012 - 11:47:48 EST