Re: [textadept] Proposal for change to Java lexer

From: Brian Schott <briancsch....at.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:49:49 -0800

It would make sense to do the same for those classes too. (I rarely
see those classes in the code that I work on, and had apparently
succeeded in forgetting that they existed)

- Brian

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:45 AM, mitchell <c....at.caladbolg.net> wrote:
> Brian,
>
>> I propose modifying the Java lexer to mark "String" as a type. I say
>> this because it's built in to the language and has features that
>> normal classes cannot have, such as operator overloading.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> What about Double, Integer, etc.?
>
> mitchell
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "textadept" group.
> To post to this group, send email to textadept.at.googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> textadept+unsubscribe.at.googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/textadept?hl=en.
>
>
Received on Fri 21 Jan 2011 - 12:49:49 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 08 Mar 2012 - 11:58:59 EST