Re: [textadept] Poll on language modules

From: Robert <ro....at.web.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:39:14 +0100

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:04 AM, mitchell <c....at.caladbolg.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To be included in the next beta release are language modules for CSS, HTML,
> Ruby, and (possibly) Java with Adeptsenses. I didn't realize that creating
> each language module was such a chore with 4 separate files (init, commands,
> snippets, and adeptsense). I'd like to have all of that condensed into just
> an init.lua file in each directory. You can of course still 'require'
> additional .lua files as you see fit for your language modules.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> mitchell
>

The boilerplate for the snippets module is often as long as the
snippets module itself, so a single file default would definitely
simplify things.
Or was the poll question about the inclusion of more language modules
in the core distribution?

Robert
Received on Mon 28 Feb 2011 - 05:39:14 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 08 Mar 2012 - 12:00:26 EST