Re: [textadept] Poll on language modules

From: mitchell <c....at.caladbolg.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:01:39 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Robert wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:04 AM, mitchell <c....at.caladbolg.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> To be included in the next beta release are language modules for CSS, HTML,
>> Ruby, and (possibly) Java with Adeptsenses. I didn't realize that creating
>> each language module was such a chore with 4 separate files (init, commands,
>> snippets, and adeptsense). I'd like to have all of that condensed into just
>> an init.lua file in each directory. You can of course still 'require'
>> additional .lua files as you see fit for your language modules.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> mitchell
>>
>
> The boilerplate for the snippets module is often as long as the
> snippets module itself, so a single file default would definitely
> simplify things.
> Or was the poll question about the inclusion of more language modules
> in the core distribution?

The poll was for a single module init.lua file.

Thanks for the feedback.

mitchell
Received on Mon 28 Feb 2011 - 09:01:39 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 08 Mar 2012 - 12:00:28 EST