Re: [textadept] Textadept Updater

From: Zhehao Mao <zhehao.....at.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:47:37 -0500

On 03/02/2011 09:43 PM, mitchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Zhehao Mao wrote:
>
>> I'm starting a new thread for this because I think it's kind of
>> important. I've looked at the luarocks code, and it seems that all we
>> have to do is change a bunch of filepaths in order to get it to install
>> into the textadept directory instead of the luarocks directory. Do you
>> guys think forking luarocks and customizing it for textadept is the way
>> to go, or do you think we should just use the vanilla luarocks program?
>
> Ideally vanilla luarocks would be used. I don't want to distribute
> luarocks with ta.
>
> mitchell
>
Ok, wait, so I've just though of another problem. If we use hg for the
updater, wouldn't the C core have to recompiled on each update since the
hg repo only includes the source files? Perhaps luarocks would be the
better choice.

Howie
Received on Wed 02 Mar 2011 - 23:47:37 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 08 Mar 2012 - 12:01:39 EST