Re: Textadept 4.0 beta

From: James Keats <james.w.ke....at.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 07:59:53 -0700 (PDT)

On Aug 2, 6:32 pm, Ryan Pusztai <rpusz....at.gmail.com> wrote:
> Mitchell,
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:10 AM, mitchell <c....at.caladbolg.net> wrote:
> > Ryan,
>
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Ryan Pusztai wrote:
>
> >  Hi Mitchell,
> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:57 PM, mitchell <c....at.caladbolg.net> wrote:
> >>      Hi,
>
> >>      Textadept 4.0 beta is available fromhttp://textadept.googlecode.**
> >> com <http://textadept.googlecode.com>
>
> >>      See migration guide:
> >>      http://caladbolg.net/**textadeptwiki/index.php?n=**Main.Migrating4<http://caladbolg.net/textadeptwiki/index.php?n=Main.Migrating4>
>
> >>      Bugfixes:
> >>       * None.
>
> >>      Changes:
> >>       * Mac OSX uses GTK 2.24.
> >>       * Added io.open_recent_file().
> >>       * Changes to localization file again.
> >>       * buffer functions may omit the first buffer argument (e.g.
> >>      buffer.line_down() is allowed).
> >>       * Complete overhaul of menus and added accelerators to menu items.
> >>       * Renamed _m.textadept.editing.SAVE_**STRIPS_WS to
> >>      _m.textadept.editing.STRIP_**WHITESPACE_ON_SAVE.
> >>       * Renamed _m.textadept.editing.select_**scope to
> >>      _m.textadept.editing.select_**style.
> >>       * Complete new set of key commands.
> >>       * Updated to Scintilla 2.28.
>
> >>      mitchell
>
> >> I got a chance to try this beta out on Ubuntu 11.04 x86_64 and it doesn't
> >> seem to load.
> >> Here is the error message:
> >> $ ./textadept.lpng12
> >> ./textadept.lpng12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.**6: version
> >> `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./textadept.lpng12)
>
> > It seems you do not have glibc-2.14 or higher?
>
> Agreed. Ubuntu is at version 2.13 of glibc. I am running the latest release
> (not beta). Thoughts about what you are willing to do?
> --
> Regards,
> Ryan

Haha. The cheek! :-p

I'm using 32bit version of ubuntu and it works splendidly! It's a lot
faster - at least it seems to me - than 3.9 at opening many files at
once. Great work, Mitchell! :-D
Received on Wed 03 Aug 2011 - 10:59:53 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 08 Mar 2012 - 12:15:32 EST